Irrigation Scheduling
Definition; Irrigation scheduling = deciding when to irrigate and how much water to apply to meet crop water needs efficiently, ensuring optimum yield with minimum water use.
Criteria Used in Scheduling
- Soil water depletion level (e.g., 50% of available water).
- ET demand (Pan evaporation or ETc estimation).
- Crop water requirement at critical stages.
- Climatic demand (high temp. → more frequent irrigation).
Objectives of Irrigation Scheduling
- Avoid crop stress (over- or under-irrigation).
- Improve Water Use Efficiency (WUE).
- Optimize yield with minimum water.
- Minimize deep percolation, runoff, and salinity hazards.
Modern Concepts
- Deficit irrigation: Apply water below full requirement → saves water, minimal yield loss.
- Supplemental irrigation: In rainfed farming → irrigation given during dry spells.
- Conjunctive use: Combining canal + groundwater for reliability.
- Precision irrigation: Drip/sprinkler with automated scheduling using sensors.
Approaches of Irrigation Scheduling
Irrigation scheduling = deciding when and how much water to apply to crops. Different approaches are used depending on soil, crop, climate, and management level.
i) Soil-Based Approach
- Irrigation is scheduled based on soil moisture status.
- Methods:
- Gravimetric soil sampling
- Tensiometers, gypsum blocks, neutron probe
- Criteria: Irrigate when soil moisture is depleted by 40–60% of Available Water Holding Capacity (AWHC).
- Advantage: Scientific, crop-specific.
- Limitation: Needs instruments & labor.
ii) Climatic / Evapotranspiration-Based Approach
- Based on atmospheric demand (ET, temperature, sunshine, wind, RH).
- Methods:
- Pan Evaporation Method: ETc = Kc × ETo
- IW/CPE ratio method → widely used in India.
- Advantage: Directly reflects climatic variation.
- Limitation: Requires data & calculations.
iii) Crop-Based Approach
- Irrigation scheduled according to critical crop growth stages.
- Example: Wheat → CRI (21 DAS), booting, flowering. Rice → Panicle initiation, flowering
- Advantage: Very practical, easy for farmers.
- Limitation: May not optimize water fully in water-scarce areas.
iv) Plant-Based Approach
- Relies on plant stress indicators to decide irrigation timing.
- Indicators:
- Leaf water potential
- Leaf temperature (infrared thermometer)
- Stomatal resistance
- Crop Water Stress Index (CWSI)
- Advantage: Direct crop response measurement.
- Limitation: Research-level, not suitable for routine farming.
v) Fixed Interval / Calendar Approach
- Irrigation applied at regular intervals (e.g., every 7 or 10 days).
- Advantage: Simple, no instruments needed.
- Limitation: Ignores soil, crop, and climate variations → inefficient use of water.
vi) Modern Approaches
- Deficit Irrigation: Supplying less than full requirement, maximizing WUE.
- Supplemental Irrigation: In rainfed areas, irrigation applied only during dry spells.
- Conjunctive Use: Combining surface + groundwater for reliability.
vii) Sensor-based & Precision Irrigation: Automated scheduling using soil moisture sensors, remote sensing, or drip/sprinkler with ET models.
Summary Table (Exam-Ready)
Approach |
Basis |
Example Method |
Advantage |
Limitation |
Soil-based |
Soil moisture depletion |
Tensiometer, gypsum block |
Scientific & crop-specific |
Needs equipment & labor |
Climatic-based |
ET / Pan evaporation |
IW/CPE ratio, Penman-Monteith |
Climatic response |
Requires weather data |
Crop-based |
Critical stages |
Wheat → CRI, Rice → PI |
Practical, farmer-friendly |
Less precise water saving |
Plant-based |
Plant stress indicators |
Leaf water potential, CWSI |
Direct crop response |
Costly, research-level |
Fixed interval |
Time/calendar |
Every 7–10 days irrigation |
Simple & easy |
Inefficient |
Modern concepts |
WUE & sustainability |
Deficit irrigation, drip, sensors |
Efficient, water saving |
High initial cost |