Course Content
Rural Sociology and Educational Psychology 2 (2+0)
B. Sc. Agriculture (Hons.) Ist. Semester (Six Deam Commitee of ICAR)

Agricultural Livelihood Systems (ALS)

  1. Meaning

An Agricultural Livelihood System (ALS) refers to the complex set of activities, assets, and resources that rural households use to sustain their lives through agriculture and allied sectors.
It represents the interrelationship between farming, livestock rearing, fisheries, forestry, and non-farm activities, which together ensure income, food security, and well-being of the household.

FAO Definition (1999): “A livelihood system comprises the capabilities, assets, and activities required for a means of living. A livelihood is sustainable when it can cope with and recover from stresses and shocks, maintain or enhance its capabilities and assets, and provide sustainable livelihood opportunities for the next generation.”

Thus, Agricultural Livelihood Systems (ALS) focus on:

  • How people make a living through agriculture and related enterprises,
  • How they use resources and manage risks,
  • And how these systems can become sustainable and resilient in the long term.

 

  1. Concept

The concept of Agricultural Livelihood Systems is based on the idea that agriculture is not merely a production activity, but a way of life and a source of livelihood for millions of rural households.
ALS integrates social, economic, environmental, and institutional dimensions to understand how rural people:

  • Access resources (land, water, seeds, knowledge),
  • Generate income (crops, livestock, off-farm activities),
  • And cope with vulnerabilities (climate change, price fluctuation, pest attack, etc.).

Key Components of ALS:

  • Natural Capital: Land, water, soil, biodiversity, forests, and ecosystem services.
  • Human Capital: Skills, knowledge, health, and labor available to pursue livelihood strategies.
  • Physical Capital: Infrastructure, tools, machinery, irrigation facilities, and housing.
  • Financial Capital: Savings, credit, remittances, and access to financial services.
  • Social Capital: Networks, cooperatives, SHGs, institutions, and social relations.

These assets interact to form the basis of livelihood strategies.

 

  1. Approaches to Agricultural Livelihood Systems

Different approaches have evolved to study and improve ALS. The major ones include:

(a) Sustainable Livelihood Approach (SLA)

  • Developed by DFID (Department for International Development, UK).
  • Focuses on sustainability, participation, and people-centered development.
  • Emphasizes the importance of strengthening livelihood assets to reduce vulnerability.

(b) Farming Systems Approach (FSA)

  • Developed by FAO and ICAR for agricultural development.
  • Views the farm as an integrated system combining crops, livestock, fisheries, and forestry.
  • Aims to optimize resource use and increase farm productivity while maintaining ecological balance.

(c) Integrated Rural Development Approach

  • Promotes diversification of livelihoods beyond farming, such as cottage industries, agro-processing, and services.
  • Encourages integration of agriculture with rural enterprises to reduce dependency on a single income source.

(d) Participatory Approach

  • Involves the community in identifying problems and designing solutions for improving their livelihoods.
  • Builds on indigenous knowledge, local needs, and collective decision-making.

(e) Gender-Sensitive Livelihood Approach

  • Recognizes the critical role of women in agriculture and ensures equal access to land, credit, training, and decision-making.

 

  1. Framework of Agricultural Livelihood Systems

The ALS Framework provides a structured way to analyze and improve livelihoods. It helps to identify the link between assets, policies, institutions, and outcomes.

  • Core Components of the ALS Framework

Component

Description

1. Livelihood Assets

Natural, human, physical, financial, and social capital available to individuals or households.

2. Vulnerability Context

Shocks (climate, pests, market failures), trends (population, technology), and seasonality (income, employment).

3. Policies, Institutions, and Processes

Government schemes, local governance, markets, NGOs, laws, and cultural norms that influence access to assets.

4. Livelihood Strategies

Ways people combine resources and activities to achieve livelihood goals — e.g., crop-livestock integration, migration, wage labor, etc.

5. Livelihood Outcomes

Final results such as improved income, reduced vulnerability, enhanced food security, sustainable resource management, and well-being.

 

  1. ALS Approach in Practice

In the Indian context, Agricultural Livelihood Systems are strengthened through:

  • Integrated Farming System (IFS) models
  • Watershed management programs
  • Rural skill development programs (like PMKVY)
  • Farmer Producer Organizations (FPOs)
  • MGNREGA and SHGs (supporting off-farm livelihood)
  • Climate-resilient agriculture initiatives (NICRA, NMSA, etc.)

 

  1. Importance of Studying ALS
  • Helps in identifying livelihood constraints and potential interventions.
  • Promotes sustainable and diversified income sources.
  • Supports policy formulation for rural development and poverty alleviation.
  • Encourages resource-efficient farming systems.
  • Aids in reducing vulnerability to climate and economic shocks.

 

Summary Table

Aspect

Description

Meaning

System of livelihood activities centered on agriculture and allied sectors.

Goal

To ensure sustainable income, food security, and resilience.

Approaches

Sustainable Livelihood Approach, Farming System Approach, Participatory Approach, Gender-sensitive Approach.

Framework Elements

Assets → Vulnerability → Institutions → Strategies → Outcomes.

Outcome

Sustainable, diversified, and resilient agricultural livelihoods.

 

error: Content is protected !!