Course Content
ASRB NET Extension Education
    About Lesson
    Participatory Approaches in Extension Education
    1. Farmer Field Schools (FFS)
    • Concept: Farmers learn by doing through field-based discovery learning.
    • Origin: Started in Indonesia in 1989 under FAO’s IPM program for rice.
    • Method:
      • Groups of 20–25 farmers meet weekly in their fields.
      • Observe, analyze, and make crop management decisions.
      • Facilitator guides but farmers decide.
    • Principle: Farmers are experts of their own fields.
    • Impact:
      • Improved pest management & reduced pesticide use.
      • Built confidence and leadership among farmers.

     

    1. Participatory Rural Appraisal (PRA)
    • Concept: A set of participatory tools and methods for rural people to share, analyze, and enhance their knowledge of life and conditions.
    • Introduced by: Robert Chambers (1980s).
    • Tools/Methods:
      • Mapping (social maps, resource maps).
      • Transect Walks (walking across the village to understand resources).
      • Seasonal Calendars (to analyze crop cycles, labor, income, diseases).
      • Ranking & Scoring (priority ranking, preference ranking).
      • Venn Diagrams (institutions and their importance).
    • Principle: “Handing over the stick to farmers” (farmers lead, outsiders facilitate).
    • Uses in India: Watershed management, community development, need assessment for extension programs.

     

    Tools o Participatory Rural Appraisal (PRA)

    i) Mapping

    • Types:
      • Social Map: Shows households, caste, religion, health centers, schools, etc. → Helps understand social structure.
      • Resource Map: Depicts land, water bodies, forests, roads, irrigation, crops, etc. → Helps in resource planning.
    • Purpose: To visualize who has what and where.
    • Participation: Villagers themselves draw the maps on the ground (using sticks, stones, rangoli powder, etc.), not the outsiders.

     

    ii) Transect Walks

    • Meaning: Walking systematically with villagers across the village/fields to observe and discuss resources, problems, and opportunities.
    • Outcome: Transect diagram showing soil types, crops, trees, water, livestock, and constraints in each zone.
    • Purpose: To get a first-hand understanding of the local situation.
    • Advantage: Builds rapport + helps identify local innovations.

     

    iii) Seasonal Calendars

    • Meaning: Villagers prepare a calendar of activities/events across the year.
    • Uses:
      • Cropping pattern (sowing → harvesting).
      • Labor demand.
      • Income/Expenditure cycle.
      • Disease outbreaks (human, animal, crop).
      • Rainfall patterns.
    • Purpose: Helps in planning interventions (e.g., introducing new crops or controlling pests at the right time).

     

    iv) Ranking & Scoring

    • Types:
      • Preference Ranking: Farmers rank alternatives (e.g., crop varieties, seed sources, irrigation methods).
      • Wealth Ranking: Community classifies households (rich, medium, poor) based on agreed indicators.
      • Matrix Scoring: Farmers compare different options against multiple criteria (e.g., crop yield, taste, market price, input need).
    • Purpose: Identifies priorities, preferences, and constraints of the community.

     

    v) Venn Diagrams

    • Meaning: Circles represent institutions, groups, or organizations related to the community.
      • Circle size = importance.
      • Circle distance from center = closeness of relationship.
    • Purpose:
      • Understand institutional linkages (e.g., farmers → cooperative society, KVK, bank, panchayat).
      • Identify gaps in service delivery.

     

    1. Rapid Rural Appraisal (RRA)
    • Concept: Earlier approach than PRA (1970s–80s).
    • Method: Quick data collection by outsiders with farmers’ help.
    • Nature: Extractive → outsider-driven.
    • Limitations: Less participatory compared to PRA; more like survey research.
    • Use: Baseline surveys, quick assessments.

     

    1. Participatory Technology Development (PTD)
    • Concept: Farmers + researchers jointly develop and test technologies.
    • Steps:
      • Identify farmers’ problems.
      • Joint experimentation.
      • Farmer evaluation.
      • Refinement & dissemination.
    • Examples:
      • Soil fertility management.
      • Crop variety selection.
      • Indigenous technical knowledge (ITK) + modern science.

     

    1. Farmer-to-Farmer Extension (F2F)
    • Concept: Successful farmers act as extension agents for other farmers.
    • Principle: Farmers learn better from peers than outsiders.
    • Advantages:
      • Cost-effective.
      • Builds trust and adoption.
    • Example: Krishi Vigyan Kendras (KVKs) promoting progressive farmers as role models.

     

    1. Village Knowledge Centers / Community Information Centers
    • Concept: ICT-based participatory hubs that provide real-time agricultural information.
    • Services: Weather forecasts, market prices, government schemes, pest/disease alerts.
    • Examples in India:
      • MS Swaminathan Research Foundation’s VKCs in Tamil Nadu.
      • Common Service Centers (CSCs) under Digital India.

     

    1. Self-Help Groups (SHGs) & Farmer Producer Organizations (FPOs)
    • Concept: Small groups of farmers (especially women in SHGs) that promote collective decision-making and action.
    • Functions:
      • Savings and credit.
      • Collective purchase of inputs.
      • Collective marketing of produce.
    • Example:
      • NABARD’s SHG-Bank linkage program (1992).
      • 10000 FPO scheme launched by Govt. of India (2020).

     

    Difference between RRA and PRA

    Aspect

    RRA (Rapid Rural Appraisal)

    PRA (Participatory Rural Appraisal)

    Origin

    Developed in late 1970s–80s

    Developed in 1980s–90s by Robert Chambers

    Main Purpose

    Quick data collection about rural conditions for outsiders

    Empowering rural people to analyze, plan, and act

    Approach

    Extractive → information taken from villagers by outsiders

    Empowering/Enabling → villagers generate and analyze their own information

    Who Controls?

    Controlled by outsiders (researchers/extensionists)

    Controlled by local people (farmers/community)

    Role of Villagers

    Respondents to outsiders’ questions

    Analysts & planners of their own situation

    Role of Outsiders

    Act as investigators

    Act as facilitators

    Nature

    More survey-oriented

    More participatory and action-oriented

    Tools Used

    Interviews, questionnaires, observation

    Mapping, transect walks, seasonal calendars, ranking, Venn diagrams, etc.

    Time Requirement

    Short → days to weeks

    Longer → weeks to months

    Outcome

    Information for outsiders’ use (research reports, project design)

    Information + community empowerment & action plans

    Example

    Baseline surveys, feasibility studies

    Watershed development, SHG formation, community planning

     

    error: Content is protected !!